Friday, October 10, 2008

McCain Has Not a Shred of Decency Left

After a week of whipping up his supporters into a Nazi-style frenzy against Barack Obama, McCain has nothing but points lost in the polls to show for it. It has not helped his campaign at all. In fact, it has hurt his standing in the polls.

McCain has spent a week raising doubts about the character of Obama, a campaign tactic that is tried and true and quite frankly fair game. However, what McCain has done is that he has gone far beyond standard campaign rhetoric. He and Palin have manipulated the anger of their die-hard believers into focusing their wrath, not on the problems of the economy and how they were created, but on Barack Obama himself. They have done this by portraying him as a dark and sinister character who can't be trusted. They have played into the ignorance of the "low information voters," the folks out there who work hard, obey the laws, try to pay their bills, and have been hit hard by the economic woes. But nevertheless, these people are prone to believe the internet rumors and urban legends about Obama such as the outlandish claim that he is a Muslim. If people believe he's a Muslim, the McCain camp knew that it wouldn't take much to get them to connect the dots by associating him with William Ayers and Jeremiah Wright. They have now, for this small segment of the electorate, created a dangerous brew of leading these people to believe that Obama is somehow un-American, an Arab, someone who consorts with terrorists, or even worse, a terrorist himself who is a part of an American sleeper cell.

This has got to stop. Bob Shrum today on the Huffington Post, has a good article about this. He recalls the McCarthy Hearings which ran out of steam when Boston attorney Joseph Welch said to McCarthy, "You have done enough. Have you no sense of decency sir? At long last have you left no sense of decency?"

Shrum says that someone should say those words to McCain. Indeed the wrath and anger generated at the McCain/Palin events could cause violence. That's why I say something "Nazi-like" is in a surreal way taking hold. Shrum ends his column tonight with this paragraph:

"The reality is that in an America facing two wars and a mounting economic crisis, these despicable appeals aren't working. Obama's lead is mounting, nationally and in the battleground states. But there is a threat here too that is all too real. When I heard someone in a Palin crowd yell out "traitor" as the candidate lashed out at the Democratic nominee, I thought of the full-page ad that appeared in a Dallas newspaper on the morning of Nov. 22, 1963. The headline -- "Wanted for Treason" -- was sprawled across a poster-sized photo of President John F. Kennedy." (Here's the link: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bob-shrum/time-to-ask-mccain-have-y_b_133814.html).

God help us!

7 Comments:

Anonymous Burr Deming said...

Before we make a choice we may regret for the next four years, the accusations against Barack Obama should be carefully considered, as they are here.

5:00 AM

 
Blogger Glenn Jonas said...

The "accusations" against Barack Obama are baseless. There is nothing to them. They were aired out during the primaries and several major newspapers have done extensive investigations and found nothing there. The New York Times is the most recent, last weekend.

McCain is exploiting the ignorance of people by playing guilt by association. Politically, it has not worked for him. Morally, it is sleazy and reprehensible. They are appealing to the base nature of people and rather than inspiring America in the midst of the crises we find ourselves, they are frightening people. Not the kind of temperment I want in a president. Sorry.

9:22 AM

 
Blogger jr said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

1:19 AM

 
Blogger jr said...

One association...I could buy that as being a poor decision or just a mistake. Two associations...I could probably be willing to consider that the same given that Obama is from Chicago and it's known for corruption in politics. When the list grows to half a dozen...that's a different story. The list is actually longer than that but any opponent to Obama is lucky to get airtime to mention one or two...

Charles Krauthammer, Washington Post columnist, has an intriguing piece that looks at the significance of Obama's associations because of Obama's novelty to the national political scene. He mentions the McCarthyite accusations in his piece. Leave it to McCain to ask the right questions but at the wrong time...obviously a day late and a dollar short.

Anyway, here are some additional articles from a series on Obama...

This article links Obama with Communist radical Frank Marshall Davis, an Obama mentor from his youth.

This article is about the close link with and support Obama gave to ACORN, the leftist activist group that has been found to have been participating in massive amounts of voter fraud across the nation.

This article relates the influence of the radical Saul Alinsky on Obama and his thought. Alinsky has been called the Father of Community Organizing.

Obama's father was radically socialistic as seen here.

Finally, here is an article on Obama and American terrorist William Ayers.

For more in this series see here.

This doesn't even bring into the conversation Father Pflegler, or Franklin Raines and James Johnson (both of whom funneled millions out of Fannie Mae as CEO)...see here and here.

Last on the list, because they're the only ones the media ever really vetted are Rev. Wright and Tony Rezko, both of whom Obama threw under the bus when they became liabilities.

None of these associations or influences were fully vetted by the media (like they have rightfully done with Palin over the last few weeks) because the media, with few exceptions, was so enamored with Obama that they spent their time and resources fighting his battle against Clinton.

Speaking of the McCarthy era, the "truth squads" Obama called out in Missouri and his threats regarding the Fairness_Doctrine sound about as close to a Nazi or even Communist threat to freedom of speech and freedom of the press as I can remember.

1:54 AM

 
Blogger foxofbama said...

Frank Rich article in NY Times today is strongest I have seen to date.
And you will want to make a point to catch the discussion tomorrow on NPR Fresh Air on Sarah Palin.
Two notes aside: Story on Lincoln Memorial in Current new yorker is fascinating; has resonances for me to the oral history surrounding Jesus of the Gospels.
And 2) Study the preacher McIntyre in Ron Rash's new novel just out, Serena.
Would love to see you do a review for Baptists Today on Rash as yall have the Mars Hill area in common.

PS: looks like JR missed the article on Ayers connections to SC Governor Sanford, which with Mac Brunson as a classmate at Furman, connects Ayers to WA Criswell and FBC Dallas; though FBC Dallas was certifiably a terrorist organization in 56 if you take Curtis Freeman of Duke's word for Criswell speech to joint session of the SC legislature.

7:15 PM

 
Blogger jr said...

I'm not up on SC politics, but playing a game of six degrees of separation will link anyone with anyone (not that I'm an apologist for Criswell). Using that kind of logic, you could probably link Osama bin Ladin with Billy Graham or the pope in only a few steps.

Ayers isn't the real issue, as far as I'm concerned anyway. He's a piece to the puzzle, but not the centerpiece.

11:37 PM

 
Blogger foxofbama said...

Jr:
Somebody who talks politics as much as you really should bone up on SC Primary 2000.
You can google up several articles and Bill Rauch, the former mayor of Beaufort has a great chapter in his book four years ago Politikin.
And I hope Dr. Jonas will join Tony Cartledge and impress on all of you div students the works of Tim Tyson, including his contribution to Jumpin Jim Crow.
This national election is about much bigger than Race, but ministers to be should have a conversational knowledge of the great personal history Tyson shares.

4:31 PM

 

Post a Comment

<< Home