On
21 February of this year, at age 99, Rev. Billy Graham died. When I first heard the news, my mind
immediately went back to my childhood.
Billy Graham was a staple of my childhood. I have vivid memories of traveling with my
parents on Sunday evenings listening to WBT radio in Charlotte hearing Graham’s
“The Hour of Decision” broadcast. I remember
frequent broadcasts of Billy Graham Crusades on television in the evenings, and
of course, we watched as a family. To be
honest, with a very limited number of channels back in that day, we did not
have much choice. Perhaps most importantly,
I trace my spiritual awakening or “conversion” experience as Evangelicals term
it, to one of those evenings watching Graham preach. In short, Billy Graham was vital to my youth
and adolescent years and has been an important part of my spiritual journey
through life.
In the middle of the 20th
century, William G. McLoughlin wrote a book called Modern Revivalism: Charles Grandison Finney to Billy Graham. At the time of its publication, (1959) Graham’s
career was blossoming. McLoughlin argued
that in the 19th and 20th centuries, revivalism largely
defined American Protestantism fostered by numerous itinerant evangelists, but
that throughout the period a favorite evangelist always seemed to capture the
nation’s attention. He built his thesis
around evangelists such as Charles G. Finney, Dwight L. Moody, Samuel P. Jones,
Benjamin F. Mills, Billy Sunday and Billy Graham. To McLoughlin’s work, I would add from the 18th
century the great evangelist George Whitefield.
Graham’s career, of course, stretched into the early 21st
century.
Billy Graham’s death marks the end
of a long tradition in American Protestantism.
Although revivalism continues to be practiced by many evangelical
Protestants, because of the proliferation of television, the internet, and social
media, there are so many evangelists on the religious landscape, there would be
no way that the nation would ever again consider one of them to be “America’s
Pastor,” the unofficial title given to Billy Graham by many. President Trump has a cadre of Evangelicals
who serve to “advise” him on spiritual matters.
There is not one of them with the stature of Billy Graham in his prime
or any of the other evangelists described by McLoughlin.
While Graham’s career began as a
preacher/evangelist, he rose above being a mere preacher of the Gospel. For the last half of the 20th
century Graham essentially became to Protestantism what the Pope is to Roman
Catholicism. He was a “statesman” for
the Protestant Christian faith, representing it to millions of people around
the world and serving as its unofficial spokesperson to representatives from
other religions in the world. In fact,
scholars of his life will study for years to come the question of whether or
not he moved toward a more Universalist perspective in his theology as he got
older. In the 1950s, he integrated his
crusades, much to the chagrin of many Fundamentalist southern Christians, and
although he did not push for integration in society as hard as some civil
rights leaders desired, he did take a step in the right direction.
Graham was not without his
flaws. He was human. Several years ago, the Nixon tapes revealed
some horribly anti-Semitic comments uttered by Graham in the Oval Office with
Richard Nixon. Graham apologized
profusely to Jewish leaders for years after the revelation. In the early years of the AIDS epidemic, he
made some uninformed comments he later regretted about AIDS being punishment for
sin. There were problems in his family
life due to his long periods of absence from his children, according to an
article in the Washington Post (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/acts-of-faith/wp/2018/02/21/divorce-drugs-drinking-billy-grahams-children-and-their-absent-father/?utm_term=.aa4a56f3da3b). And many of us who take social justice
seriously really wish he had been stronger on civil rights, especially given
the platform and respect he had. We
probably would be asking too much for him to have been progressive on LGBT
issues given his era. But, he could have
been a much stronger force for Civil Rights in the 1950s and 60s. Although he made mistakes, his reputation for
financial honesty and genuine concern for people clearly separated him from the
evangelists of the last quarter of the 20th century whose financial
and sexual scandals make them more a caricature than any representative of God.
So rest in peace Billy Graham. As one friend of mine said yesterday on
Facebook, there is probably a very long line of people waiting to thank you as
you walk into the gates of Heaven.
No comments:
Post a Comment